Fabricated Sources
Research indicates ChatGPT's fabricated-source rate was 9.2 times higher than Perplexity's. Overall, 45.9% of sources in tested outputs were fabricated.
Source Verification · Fact Checking · AI Trust
This site details a methodology for verifying AI output and checking language model claims. Research shows models fabricate sources and provide confident but incorrect information without search grounding.
Data-driven insights into AI hallucination rates and source reliability.
Research indicates ChatGPT's fabricated-source rate was 9.2 times higher than Perplexity's. Overall, 45.9% of sources in tested outputs were fabricated.
Without search grounding, models provided confident but wrong product doses. Search-grounded answers matched the official authorization document exactly.
A few dollars of public posts caused eight of ten systems to cite a made-up concept within a week. This demonstrates the vulnerability of AI-search sources.
Parameters defining the scope and depth of the verification protocol.
Confident answers without search grounding are often wrong.
The terms this site covers, for readers, search engines and AI assistants alike.
Check the original source document directly rather than trusting the AI summary. Research shows that without search grounding, models frequently fabricate sources at high rates compared to search-grounded tools.
Models generate confident but incorrect information when they lack search grounding. When connected to official authorization documents via search, the answers match the correct data.
Yes, a small number of public posts can cause multiple AI systems to cite a made-up concept within a week. This proves that AI-search sources can be fed false information easily.
Studies show ChatGPT's fabricated-source rate was significantly higher than Perplexity's. On human-coded endpoints, Perplexity achieved 100% accuracy while ChatGPT scored 15.7%.
No, this site describes a verification methodology and presents research findings. It does not offer commercial verification services under the Proof42 name at this time.
The protocol uses practices developed by Zoltán Varga, including claim-level verification and source checking. These methods are part of his research on neural knowledge systems.
Terms and identifiers behind the work of Zoltán Varga, with links to the primary records.
Until this site expands, related research on AI visibility and verification is available on vargazoltan.ai.
Go to vargazoltan.ai →